Mission Statement
I listen to the great, enlightening, and fun podcast on pens called
the Pen Addict. The podcast is hosted by one of the best podcasters in
the business, Myke Hurley, and the cohost is Brad Dowdy. Dowdy was kind
enough to come on my podcast twice, once to discuss pens, and once to
discuss getting your grail knife. In a recent episode
they had on another online acquaintance of mine and great writer for
Everyday Carry, Ed Jelley. They talked about burnout. I have been very
fortunate and not had a bout of burnout yet. With the podcast,
schedules are tough, especially when my 1 year old decided to go on a
sleep strike, but if I could I'd record every week. I haven't missed a
week of posts here ever. Suffice to say, I have no burnout issues. But
they brought up the idea of a mission statement for a blog and I
thought it would be a good think to lay out. In part, this helps me
organize my thoughts, but also I think it might help new and old readers
understand where I am coming from, which could, in turn, make the
review scores more helpful.
So, without further ado, the Tom Wolfe, stream of consciousness style Everyday Commentary Mission Statement.
Groupthink is the enemy of rational thought. The idea that something is correct simply based on the number of people that believe it is, absent election results, a classic form of cognitive distortion. It infects every aspect of our lives, but it is especially pernicious (not in terms of its impact, but in terms of how widespread it is) in the gear world. The notion that production knives are lesser blades compared to customs is one example. The obsession over lumens is another. But the worst form of this cognitive distortion comes in the form of brand loyalty. I do not and have never understood the idea of being a fanboy. It is a bill of goods sold to us by marketing people. Screw them. If Topo Designs wants to put out an array of twee shit and pretend like it is real, well design, capable gear, that's fine. Just don't expect me to go along with that notion because you have models with beards in your ad copy or a faux authentic quirk feel on your webpage.
The mission of this blog is fourfold:
1.
To start a conversation via useful, thoughtful, and consistent
information about everyday carry gear in as comprehensive a scope as
possible;
2. To explore what I have called the "enthusiast mindset" and good design;
3.
To ruthlessly and gleefully destroy any form of hype--including but not
limited to brand loyalty, bandwagonning with trends, and marketing
bullshit; and
4. Bring to light great undiscovered or overlooked stuff at any price range.
As
a side effect of these four things, we, as a community, have given an
enormous amount back to charity. In life in general and in my online
life, I think it is important to tie all endeavors back to a pro-social
goal if possible. Here, on this blog, I am fortunately to get and buy
review samples, and so twice a year I run giveaways with the review
samples as prizes. In the past six years, I have given away
more than $8,000 in gear and we have raised close to $6,000 for the
Wounded Warrior Project and my state Drug Court program. I feel like
doing this insulates the blog from worries I have about it being nothing
more than a worship of material things.
The mission statement warrants a bit more explanation.
Thorough Reviews
When
I started this blog there was very little in the way of systematic
reviews of gear. There were a lot of folks on YouTube, and a few that
wrote, that reviewed gear, but not much of it was in a format that
applied the same standards from item to item. Dan of BladeReviews
was and is the absolute pinnacle of the form and so, using his general
ideas as a template, and harkening back to my beloved EGM from my
childhood, I developed scoring systems for each piece of gear. I still
have a few in the bank, one of which will be revealed some time in July.
These scoring systems allow me to evaluate products the same way,
looking at the same attributes over time. This, hopefully, gives you an
idea of how products compare to each other. When doing research on
what to buy, people don't just want to know if something works, they
want to know if it works better than something else, and the score
allows you to do that in a quick and easy way. But the text is also
important as it fills in the gaps where the score alone might leave you
guessing.
So the scoring system
is the first part of this. But the second and more important part is
the comments section. The dialog in the comments section is the very
heart of the site. If someone just read my review they would be missing
something 60% of the value of said review. Reader comments and
reactions are exceptionally informative as they widen the experience
pool, giving you a real and meaningful sample size of feedback.
Furthermore, I have been lucky in that the comments section, instead of
devolving in the usual internet wastewater, has risen to be something
great, thanks to very knowledgeable readers.
As
a quick side note, I work very hard to get comments up as a fast as
possible, but spammers have slowed this process. With the advent of
these spammers the comments section has become the single most time
consuming aspect of the website. For whatever reason the site does
exceedingly well in SEO terms and Google consistently ranks this site's
reviews as the #1 hit or, in the worst case scenario, never less than
the #10 hit. That, however, causes spammers to attack the site daily
and I do my best to manage them.
Finally, choosing
what to review is also important to the blog. I want to review
everything. Yes, everything. I want to review classics and new stuff,
expensive stuff and cheap stuff, mainstream items and boutique pieces.
I want you to be able to go to the Review page and find anything you
want to read about there. It's not quite there yet, but its getting
there. I also want a wide range of stuff, from custom knives to cheapo
stuff. I don't want to miss anything.
Enthusiast Mindset
With
the rise of the Internet and huge reservoirs of information like CPF or
Instagram, people's nerdy tendencies have morphed into a very efficient
and very comprehensive way of processing information. A person new to
knives quickly arrives at the Sebenza.
Twenty years ago, it may have taken years for a person to realize just how good that knife is and how important a place it has in the market. Now, a few Google searches and you are there. But the enthusiast mindset is not just about gear, I have found it very useful in all kinds of research. The method of sifting through piles of data has made me a better lawyer. I can say that with ease. Those of us with this bug know how it is useful. We don't both going to subpar restaurants or waste time looking at information sources that aren't reliable, whether it is about buying a car or finding that lanyard bead you need.
Twenty years ago, it may have taken years for a person to realize just how good that knife is and how important a place it has in the market. Now, a few Google searches and you are there. But the enthusiast mindset is not just about gear, I have found it very useful in all kinds of research. The method of sifting through piles of data has made me a better lawyer. I can say that with ease. Those of us with this bug know how it is useful. We don't both going to subpar restaurants or waste time looking at information sources that aren't reliable, whether it is about buying a car or finding that lanyard bead you need.
Similarly, with good
design. Handling thousands of pieces of gear and reviewing more than
300 hundred, has taught me in an experiential way what good design is,
to a limited degree, and I like exploring that with each new knife or
light I get.
Hype Busting
Groupthink is the enemy of rational thought. The idea that something is correct simply based on the number of people that believe it is, absent election results, a classic form of cognitive distortion. It infects every aspect of our lives, but it is especially pernicious (not in terms of its impact, but in terms of how widespread it is) in the gear world. The notion that production knives are lesser blades compared to customs is one example. The obsession over lumens is another. But the worst form of this cognitive distortion comes in the form of brand loyalty. I do not and have never understood the idea of being a fanboy. It is a bill of goods sold to us by marketing people. Screw them. If Topo Designs wants to put out an array of twee shit and pretend like it is real, well design, capable gear, that's fine. Just don't expect me to go along with that notion because you have models with beards in your ad copy or a faux authentic quirk feel on your webpage.
An
offshoot of this group think is the Shill Site. Shill Sites are my #1
enemy. They are the archnemisis of this site. As aside, in life I have
always found it helpful to have an archnemisis, whether it was a snooty
a-hole in my philosophy classes in undergrad or another lawyer who
treats me like I am a five year old simply because he passed the bar
when my parents were in diapers. I have turned away opportunities and
left others because they strayed too close to the line of "say nice
things about this thing you have never seen, touched or used". Like
most people that have been in the gear game for a while, I can judge
something based on specs, sure, but to write line after line after line
about a product that is pretty underwhelming spec-wise just because it
is new or because they paid me is something I can't do. I like the
editorial independence I have here and my two other writing gigs (AllOutdoor and Gear Junkie).
Neither AllOutdoor or Gear Junkie have ever asked me to tone down
harsh, hype-busting text. NEVER. In other places I have written for or
have been asked to write for I was asked to change my opinion, always
to make it less harsh, by the way, and when that happened I told them
one thing: I quit. I don't do this as a living. I don't do this for
the money or the gear. I do this because it is fun to interact with you
the reader. So when someone asks me to do something that is violative
of that fundamental principle the reaction is the same--I quit. I am a
big quitter in that way.
Is
your knife a Hinderer design? Better be good, because I don't care
who's name is attached. Is your backpack super minimalist because
that's what sells? I don't care. Is your light designed by the single
greatest flashlight designer and electrical engineer in the history of
flashlights? So what. If you want hype, go elsewhere. I could
monetize this site in a bunch of ways that would force me to buy into
the hype more than I do. And to that I say--I quit. Whoops, not that
sassy automated response. Or actual, because I never started, NO WAY.
Gem Finder
Muyshondt's lights are the best in the world.
I have no doubt about this having handled and reviewed lights of all prices. No question. But I am just as excited to review the soon to be released $39 Klarus Mi7 as I am to review the Aeon. Finding great stuff, either from a small batch maker, or a budget production company, that you might have overlooked is one of the most fun things about reviewing gear. I love it. So if I have to dig through the crusty forgotten parts of the Internet to find that gem awaiting some attention, I'll do it.
I have no doubt about this having handled and reviewed lights of all prices. No question. But I am just as excited to review the soon to be released $39 Klarus Mi7 as I am to review the Aeon. Finding great stuff, either from a small batch maker, or a budget production company, that you might have overlooked is one of the most fun things about reviewing gear. I love it. So if I have to dig through the crusty forgotten parts of the Internet to find that gem awaiting some attention, I'll do it.
In
the end, I write this site for you the reader. I like interacting with
all of you via email, social media, or the comments section. I like
going on this journey with folks. I like being a surrogate for
experience. I understand that I have been given a great opportunity
through this website to see and use a metric ton of gear, and I know
that lots of folks don't have that same opportunity. So my goal is to
not be an expert, but to be a surrogate. To tell you in as much detail
as possible why I like something or don't like something and to tell you
why I think you might agree.
Keep reading. And thanks.